Why Does Typescript Use Object Property Assignments As Object Keys And Variable Assignments As Function Arguments?
Solution 1:
The evaluation of an assignation is the value. The purpose of the IIFE function is to create an object that works both ways value -> key and key -> value.
An interesting console.log
here is Fruit
itself.
varFruit;
(function (Fruit) {
Fruit[Fruit["APPLE"] = 50] = "APPLE";
Fruit[Fruit["ORANGE"] = 10] = "ORANGE";
})(Fruit || (Fruit = {}));
// main.jsvar bowl = [Fruit.APPLE, Fruit.ORANGE];
console.log(Fruit);
If we start over the whole explanation :
Fruit is passed to the IIFE function, if it doesn't exist, it's initialized as an empty object {}
.
Then the first couple key -> value is inserted into the object, that will result as :
{
APPLE: 50,
}
(Because the assignation is executed first on the line) :
Fruit[Fruit["APPLE"] = 50] = "APPLE";
Then the second couple is inserted into Fruit
object :
Fruit[50] = "APPLE";
Solution 2:
The expression Fruit["APPLE"] = 0
evaluates to 0
, or the value of the key assignment. Which means that in addition to assigning
Fruit["APPLE"] = 0
we are also doing this assignment
Fruit[0] = "APPLE"
which makes it so that you can both get the string name of the enum by its number value and the number value by its string name.
Solution 3:
Fruit[Fruit["APPLE"] = 0]
doesn't mean to be Fruit.APPLE
:
Fruit["APPLE"] = 0
So, it is Fruit[0]
. Now, Fruit[0] = "APPLE"
.
Thus, you'll have:
Fruit[0] = "APPLE"
Fruit[1] = "ORANGE"
But not:
Fruit.APPLE = "APPLE"Fruit.ORANGE = "ORANGE"
So, wrapping them inside IIFE:
(function (Fruit) {
// here, Fruit is {}
})(Fruit || (Fruit = {}))
And when using:
Fruit[0] = "APPLE"
Will eventually become:
Fruit = { 0: "APPLE", 1: "ORANGE" }
Hence, your example will be invalid.
Post a Comment for "Why Does Typescript Use Object Property Assignments As Object Keys And Variable Assignments As Function Arguments?"